Holding Girl's Hands, Opening Pant Zip Not Sex Assault: Bombay High Court

The mom discovered the accused holding her daughters hand and his pant zip open (Representational)


The Nagpur bench of the Bombay Excessive Courtroom has dominated that holding the fingers of a minor lady and opening the zip of her pants doesn’t fall beneath the purview of ‘sexual assault’ or ‘aggravated sexual assault’ of the Safety of Youngsters from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

The statement was made by a single bench of Justice Pushpa Ganediwala on January 15 whereas passing an order on an enchantment filed by a 50-year-old man difficult a classes courtroom’s order convicting him for sexually assaulting and molesting a five-year-old lady.

The convict, Libnus Kujur, was in October 2020 convicted beneath sections 354-A (1)(i) (outraging modesty) and 448 (house-trespass) of the IPC and sections 8 (sexual assault), 10 (aggravated sexual assault) and 12 (sexual harassment) of the POCSO Act. He was sentenced to 5 years in jail.

In her judgement, Justice Ganediwala famous that whereas the prosecution has established that the accused entered the home of the lady with an intention to outrage her modesty or sexually harass her, it has not been capable of show the cost of ‘sexual assault’ or ‘aggravated sexual assault’.

The excessive courtroom famous that the definition of “sexual assault” beneath the POCSO Act says that there needs to be “bodily contact with sexual intent with out penetration”.

“The acts of ‘holding the fingers of the prosecutrix (sufferer)’, or ‘opened zip of the pant’ as has been allegedly witnessed by the prosecution witness (mom of the lady), within the opinion of this courtroom, doesn’t match within the definition of ‘sexual assault’,” Justice Ganediwala stated.

The excessive courtroom additional stated that the information of the current case will not be ample to repair the prison legal responsibility on the accused (Kujur) for the alleged offence of aggravated sexual assault.

“On the most, the minor offence punishable beneath part 354-A(1)(i) of the IPC learn with part 12 of the POCSO Act is proved in opposition to the appellant (Kujur),” the courtroom stated.

The prosecution’s case is that Kujur had on February 12, 2018 entered the home of the sufferer when her mom had gone to work.

When the mom returned from work, she discovered the accused holding the hand of her daughter with the zip of his pants open.


The mom, whereas recording her proof within the decrease courtroom, had stated that her daughter had knowledgeable her that the accused particular person had eliminated his personal half from the pant and requested the sufferer to come back to mattress for sleeping.

The excessive courtroom ended Kujur’s conviction beneath sections Eight and 10 of POCSO Act, however upheld his conviction beneath the opposite sections.

The courtroom, nonetheless, stated it was modifying the sentence and famous that Kujur has thus far undergone 5 months in jail.

“Contemplating the character of the act, which might be established by the prosecution and contemplating the punishment offered for the aforesaid crimes, within the opinion of this Courtroom, the imprisonment which he has already undergone would serve the aim,” the courtroom stated.

The courtroom stated the accused shall be let out if he’s not required in another case.

One other judgment handed by Justice Ganediwala this month acquitting a 39-year-old man for groping a minor lady, noting that there was no “skin-to-skin contact with sexual intent” has confronted extreme flak.

The Supreme Courtroom had on Wednesday stayed operation of this order after Lawyer Normal KK Venugopal talked about the matter submitting that it was a really disturbing conclusion by the Bombay Excessive Courtroom.

(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is revealed from a syndicated feed.)

Source link